Is it similar

Is it similar?

The rhetorical situation for my ad analysis compares to that from the one of my literacy narrative essay in the way that both have a tone in which makes it easier and fun for the audience to understand. Also, these essays have a point in which the reader can agree, feel or understand the message that I am trying to convey exactly the way I'm expressing. The tone apparently switches from my literacy narrative because it is more of a serious writing since it is something that I am trying to explain an ad that I have chosen. It's something I have not experienced in my life, but something that I see in an everyday life and that sometimes as a young adult am asked about. Under my perspective, I see that the choices for the rhetorical situation I make upon this next writing assignment might affect the way I write this paper because it's completely different in humor and audience. I'm guessing it’s a challenge and well I’ll see how that goes. :) 

The Next Big Thought

Alright so for my next writing assignment... I'm not sure on what to write about since there are so many ads to choose from. I have so much to think about and I'm worried that what I choose maybe inappropriate.

What I'm considering to write about is birth control due to the fact that it's being frequently advertised. Also because it's a big controversy not only among people but also between politics. Since the pill is targeted for younger women who are sexually active at younger ages it is important that they prevent pregnancy, but is this ad assuming that younger girls are allowed to have sex at a younger age and therefore take pills to prevent pregnancy?

Anyways I think that this would be a great paper and I myself am really looking forward to it! :D

Was It A Good Paper After All?

My paper for my literacy narrative is slightly different from my rough draft considering that I added and edited the last part to my essay since it was very short and I didn't finish it. I believe that I made sufficient revisions to the focus of my paper because I was so afraid that I would skip to another topic or just completely mix another topic to my essay and loose track if what I was writing about.

After revision I was able to distinguish the patterns of errors I make which are usually writing long but very long sentences that I forget about my punctuations marks. What guide me to make the revisions I made to my paper was the peer review because I was able to understand what the reader would enjoy more and what I mistakes I did.
I think the strongest part of my paper is around the middle part of the essay and the weakest would probably be in the end because I think that I could've had a stronger ending, but I didn't.